“When it comes to science and the explanatory system explaining focuses epistemological atoms; the things that are to be explained are measurable entities. Modern science is simply based on concepts that are defined by how they are measured. These operational definitions have the advantage that you always know what you are talking about. It is not for the scientist to understand the concepts.
Concerning consciousness it is interesting to see the operational definition for what it is, an operational definition (sic!). An operational definition is what it is. If you operationally define consciousness you do not define something else operationally. Consciousness would be defined according to the operational definition. It would neither be right, nor wrong. If consciousness is defined operationally the definition is what you are working with. Your own conception of what consciousness is, is bypassed. In the explanatory setting based on operational definitions, the intuitive understanding of consciousness and the experienced consciousness are omitted.
While this permits the machinery of the natural sciences to work with consciousness there is a a flaw in the fundamental approach. The flaw does not directly concern consciousness in itself. If we define consciousness operationally with the definition X, we work with the premise that a certain subject in the experimental setting is conscious if X. This “either/or” scenario, though, becomes interesting only when we pair X with some contents. The subject, e.g., is conscious about this or that visual stimulus. Or, the subjects is conscious about this or that tactile stimulus. In the experimental setting we do not ask the subject if it sees or feels this or that. We expose the stimulus operationally, for example by putting the light on or by stroking the subjects arm. Whether or not the subject is conscious about the light or the stroking we determine via X. Without X, we conclude that the subject was not conscious about the stimulus.
The flaw is identified when we consider self-consciousness. We cannot present the self to the subject. Accordingly, if the subject is self-conscious or not we cannot determine via X. We could ask the subject but then we have already missed the target. For one thing we then must assume that subjects that do not answer are not self-conscious. Another thing is that we then miss the difference between consciousness and self-consciousness. The subject logically cannot report that it is conscious about something without being self-conscious about it. In conclusion a reasonable valid operational definition X of consciousness would not cover self-consciousness.” (Revised excerpt from Gamper, 2021.)
The 3rd conference in the Interstellar Variations series focuses the argument that the empirical science is dependent upon operational definitions why it cannot account for self-consciousness. In that case the understanding of self-consciousness would need to be based on something else.
Gamper, J (2021). Rebooting Science 1.0. BoD. Stockholm, Sweden. https://philpapers.org/rec/GAMRS-2 (Link to the ebook on Amazon and Apple).
Interstellar variations 3 is planned to be an In-Person conference in Stockholm, Sweden November 10-12, 2022. Abstracts should be sent to email@example.com with deadline June 5. Subjects must focus the core idea described in the quote above within the background of “Plan B” as stated for the two previous conferences. Please prepare a max 1000 words abstract (PDF) based on the book Rebooting Science 1.0. Information regarding acceptance should be expected before June 17.
Participants who are giving a talk: no fee.
Early birds (registered payment before July 1): €96 (ex. VAT).
Regular payment: €192 (ex. VAT).
Undergraduates: no fee.
Opens June 18
Closes August 1
Register by mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please state your status (accepted abstract/regular participant/undergraduate) in your registration email and you will get an invoice in return.
Leap AB, Kungsgatan 8, Stockholm, Sweden
Postal address: Subrosa KB, Albatrossvägen 104, 13666, Vendelsö, Sweden
Visiting address: Kungsgatan 8, Stockholm, Sweden
Questions are welcome to email@example.com.